Kawi2strokes.com Forum

Enthusiasts from around the world dedicated to the preservation and ritual flogging of the infamous Kawasaki 2-stroke Triples
It is currently Tue Apr 30, 2024 7:28 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 11:29 am 

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 12:34 pm
Posts: 676
Location: orange CA
I have a 77 Yamaha IT 175 I ride regularly here on the street. It is an absolute blast to ride around on for short stints. With a DG pipe, a well sorted carb, and my amateur port and polish it is a hoot.
I have been doing some homework with Allen from CT racing here in SoCal and this is what he came up with. The yamaha blaster 200 quad engine is loosely based on the 77 IT 175 engine.
Soooo, clearance the IT cases for a slightly cut down Blaster crank, add a RD 400 con rod, throw in a ported 240 big bore jug courtesy of LA Sleeve and now ( according to CT) we can make 40 wheel hp. It's a 235 pound bike with a half tank of fuel. Is this a dumb idea? A timebomb? I have an old 490 DLS front brake I can use but a disc would be better. What do you think?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 12:06 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 6:37 am
Posts: 10460
Location: Rio Rancho, New Mexico
sawracer wrote:
I have a 77 Yamaha IT 175 I ride regularly here on the street. It is an absolute blast to ride around on for short stints. With a DG pipe, a well sorted carb, and my amateur port and polish it is a hoot.
I have been doing some homework with Allen from CT racing here in SoCal and this is what he came up with. The yamaha blaster 200 quad engine is loosely based on the 77 IT 175 engine.
Soooo, clearance the IT cases for a slightly cut down Blaster crank, add a RD 400 con rod, throw in a ported 240 big bore jug courtesy of LA Sleeve and now ( according to CT) we can make 40 wheel hp. It's a 235 pound bike with a half tank of fuel. Is this a dumb idea? A timebomb? I have an old 490 DLS front brake I can use but a disc would be better. What do you think?


A couple of guys road race the 175's here. They have a blast, why not!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTJUTxzg ... plpp_video

_________________
Twist the throttle, tilt the horizon, and have a great time. What triples are all about...........


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 12:22 pm 

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 12:34 pm
Posts: 676
Location: orange CA
Yeah, I figured you would say that! Let me see what its all gonna cost.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 10:54 pm 

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 12:34 pm
Posts: 676
Location: orange CA
Well machine work and piston, jug, head combo will kill 1600 bucks. Still no carb, pipe, expert assembly or dyno. I'm gonna have to sit on this one for a while ;) . I'm not saying I won't but thats a lot of dough for 40 hp.
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:36 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 10:23 pm
Posts: 3825
Location: Colorado Springs, CO. USA
That is soooo clean. I've had three (at one time - all running and good shape), I'm down to one now. My kids learned to ride on them, I still have forks, tanks and a bunch of parts.

Here's me jumping one: For you Bay Area guys - that's flying tigers out by SFO - really in SSF.

Image

My older son riding one: This is at Hollister for anyone who knows it.

Image

_________________
This is true. Where I grew up the hills were so steep and long, when your ball rolled down the hill you just said "screw it"...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 4:19 pm 

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 12:34 pm
Posts: 676
Location: orange CA
It's clean because I went over everything! Pretty cheap as bike restifications go, if you don't count the dg head, swingarm, and pipe :D
This is what I started with and three more parts bikes.
Thanks for the pics!
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 11:12 pm 

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 12:34 pm
Posts: 676
Location: orange CA
For the sake of science, 40 hp in the IT frame gives it a 5.8 lb per hp ratio vs a 72 h2 with 5.7 lbs per hp. I thought it would be much more radical than that?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 12:08 am 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 6:37 am
Posts: 10460
Location: Rio Rancho, New Mexico
sawracer wrote:
For the sake of science, 40 hp in the IT frame gives it a 5.8 lb per hp ratio vs a 72 h2 with 5.7 lbs per hp. I thought it would be much more radical than that?


Where are you getting your numbers? A H2 is around 450 plus with 64 rwhp. That's 7lb/hp

_________________
Twist the throttle, tilt the horizon, and have a great time. What triples are all about...........


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 4:01 am 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 3:06 am
Posts: 4364
Location: PARIS FRANCE
IT 465 should be funniest but not the same price :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 4:59 am 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 7:03 am
Posts: 4604
Location: Milang, South Australia
Ja-Moo wrote:
sawracer wrote:
For the sake of science, 40 hp in the IT frame gives it a 5.8 lb per hp ratio vs a 72 h2 with 5.7 lbs per hp. I thought it would be much more radical than that?


Where are you getting your numbers? A H2 is around 450 plus with 64 rwhp. That's 7lb/hp

Come on John - Brochures don't lie! :shock:

_________________
"One day, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it's worth watching." : anon.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group