Kawi2strokes.com Forum

Enthusiasts from around the world dedicated to the preservation and ritual flogging of the infamous Kawasaki 2-stroke Triples
It is currently Sat Jul 12, 2025 5:51 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Sir Paul
PostPosted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 9:27 am 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 10:41 pm
Posts: 3489
Location: Mount Vision, NY
Jackman wrote:

BTW Bethel Woods and Woodstock (at least 50 miles apart) are always confused so much that there are even tee shirts and bumper stickers marketing the confusion :crazy:

Nahh I know where Woodstock is, been to the Harley dealer there and drove through there going to meet you one time.
In fact, Woodstock refused to let the promoters have the 3 day event there so when they got the OK from Max Yasger, they called the show "Woodstock" to taunt the town that shunned the show.
We all know it was actually in White Lake.
Which I believe is very close to Bethel Woods. 8-)
I just figured you meant Bethel because the last time I saw a Helm show advertised, thats where it was.
They are supreme gougers there.

_________________
Bad decisions make the best stories.



Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sir Paul
PostPosted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:31 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:06 pm
Posts: 233
Location: joliet IL
scrambler73 wrote:
the most over-rated band in the history of the musical universe. I wouldn't give $.05 to see them.

the beatles are to 60's pop music what modern day harley davidson is to trend humping leather lemmings....

"we all live in a yellow submarine"... Poetry, pure Poetry... :e9

Cody you cant be serious, the beatles changed music forever.

_________________
If Satan had a bike and fed it cats it would sound just like my bike.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sir Paul
PostPosted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:44 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 253
Location: England.
Beatles,Stones,Kinks etc..game changers, whichever way you look at it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sir Paul
PostPosted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 3:42 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 6:37 am
Posts: 10460
Location: Rio Rancho, New Mexico
Many bands or singers have changed the music world, but that's not a reason to have to like their music. The Beatles came in a bit before I was into music, I never really liked them either. I like the later hard rock.

_________________
Twist the throttle, tilt the horizon, and have a great time. What triples are all about...........


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sir Paul
PostPosted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 3:45 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 10:03 pm
Posts: 2605
Location: Birthplace of Minnesota
Do you think the beatles would have been as "big" if they weren't cute little mop-tops? They are a product of BRILLIANT promotion (akin to Harley Davidson's ability to sell the "lifestyle" of being a badass).

Let me put it this way....If 4 fat, ugly, zit faced guys would have written the songs and sang/played them exactly the same as the "fab four"....there would be no beatles. At most, they would have been a footnote in the rock and roll annals.

Of course they have a few good pop songs, but the majority of it sounds like it could have been written by a 2nd grader (not counting the drug-years). Put anything in heavy-rotation and its bound to get burned into your brain.


I'm not a huge Stones' fan, but I have respect for them. They are a blues band and have proven that they love to play.

The Kinks just plain freaking ROCK.

I've been around music my entire life. I enjoy everything. Just depends on my mood. Opera, Country, Pop, Hard Metal, whatever... I've been in a few bands and the majority of the time, I am the odd man out when the topic of conversation turns to how "paramount" the beatles were to music... I have yet to here an honest reply to my question of
"what if they would have been fat and ugly"?
:lol:

Beatles.. a good (not even great) pop band, and nothing more.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sir Paul
PostPosted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 3:57 pm 

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 2:02 pm
Posts: 247
Location: southwest wa. state
Your apparently to young to appreciate the beatles.. :e11 And the kinks suck!! :lol: I preferred dick dale or the ventures at the time..But learned to love the beatles.. and as far as appearance I guess ya never took a good look at buddy holly. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sir Paul
PostPosted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 4:07 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 3:06 am
Posts: 4364
Location: PARIS FRANCE
MC 5, Velvet Underground and the Stooges for me (know they came after the beatles) :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sir Paul
PostPosted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 4:58 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 10:41 pm
Posts: 3489
Location: Mount Vision, NY
Hey John G. Gimme "Dave death to the crown Davies" anytime baby.
If you ever heard the "Celluloid Heros" album you would love it.
Stones... eh so so. To call them a blues band is like saying this urban crap that kids like now is R&B.
R&B???? WTF is a reason to compare that head bangin crap to great R&B folks of the past.
Ray Charles, now dats rythm and blues. So Hit the road Jack.
And as far as da blues go, give me Mississippi Fred McDowel, Muddy Waters, Reverend Gary and a little Howlin Wolf.
Yes Cody, you are a bit young to have been infected by Beatlemania as a lot of us old timers were. And I never thought any of the four was cute. Especially John and Ringo. What ugly mothers they were.
AND... speakin of Mothers, now there was some fine stuff. Frank Zappa.
Most people relate to the name as a rebelious hippy using foul language.
They never knew what an outstanding guitar player he was.

Dats JMHO
:mrgreen:

To each his own.

_________________
Bad decisions make the best stories.



Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sir Paul
PostPosted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 7:54 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 1:12 pm
Posts: 266
Location: Prescott, AZ
For most of us, there is one group that strikes a chord when growing up.

For me it was Pink Floyd and David Gilmours amazing guitar playing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sir Paul
PostPosted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 9:11 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 10:08 pm
Posts: 1901
Location: Campbellville Ontario
I was never a Beatles fan, but that was me....always a bit against any kind of hysteria. I felt it insulting to love anything just because everyone else did. The Bee Gees created quite a stir and all but one them had been beaten regularly with the ugly stick. :lol: I'm enjoying a Minnesota band lately!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group