Kawi2strokes.com Forum

Enthusiasts from around the world dedicated to the preservation and ritual flogging of the infamous Kawasaki 2-stroke Triples
It is currently Tue Jul 15, 2025 11:05 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Balance it or not
PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 8:55 am 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 9:12 pm
Posts: 1902
Location: Rockville, MD USA
Regardless of how one balances:
On a street engine, are there any advantages of a balanced enigne over a typical stocker other than minimizing vibration?

_________________
There are only two types of motor sport racing:
Nitro and everything else
(Sometimes referred to as fast and slow)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Balance it or not
PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 10:48 am 

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 11:25 am
Posts: 3163
Actually, a 120 degree triple balances better than a 180 degree one ever will. Now, before you tell me I am an idiot, remember the Laverda triples. First series was 120 degree crank phasing, later ones, 180. The later engines vibrate far more than the early ones, even after the correct balance is attained. The 120 degree engines fire all 3 in one 360 degree phase, and dead head the other 360 degree cycles event. The 180 crank engine has the regular two cyls at TDC together, one on fire, one on overlap. The center cyl is 180 degrees later, and only one cyl fires. This gives us a 1809 degree firing pulse setup on the firsat 360 rotation, and a single fire on the next 360 degree phasing. Vibration city. Think of the 180 engine as an inline 4, with one cylinder spark plug wire yanked off.

Lets take a closer look at the Honda inline 125 5 cylinder, and Ferrari V12.

125 5 had coupling reversals every 72 degrees of 360 degree revolution, somewhat good overlap of events. But, that was on just one of the 720 degree cycles of a 4 stroke. That engine fired all 5 on one of the 360 degree phasings, and dead headed the other 360, creating a large "hole" that had other vibration issues.

The Ferrari V12 has 60 degree phasing, all 720 degrees, and is smooth as a baby's tuchas. In this engine, we have 6 equally spaced firing pulses in EACH 360 degree event, with 60 degree coupling overlap. Way smooth.

The less overlap of firing events per 360 degree rotation, the smoother the engine is, and, when balance is correct, smoother still.

Cadillac/LaSalle had a V16 4 stroke engine in the late 1930's, and it was reported to be so smooth, one could put a lit cigarette on the air filter, on end, and rev the engine, and the only thing that would alter the cigarette's position was the air blown back from the fan behind the radiator. 1930's. V16, 720 degrees, 45 degrees coupling overlap. Dead smooth.

Yes, I do have a crankshaft balancing machine, have had one for 40 plus years, came out of Hank Bechloft's "Crank Shaft Company" performance shop in Los Angeles, where I worked, and learned balancing correctly. Hank founded "Hank, the Crank" later, did balancing all the way up to his death, and, I used to go by and help when I could at Hank's new place. I did all the racer crank balancing when I worked for R.C. Engineering as well, for the Top Fuel and Pro-Stock bikes.

The question is, just how many "Star-Fire" ignitions have blown up, didn't work from new, and were recalled" That I want to know.

Just about anyone can do an ignition system these days, but, doing a good one is a lot harder than is made out in the advertizing world. I do custom ignition systems for cars, convert older point distributors to a conversion I devised and developed, using existing GM HEI modules. I do one for a regular HEI, carburetted engines, vacuum and mechanical advance, MSD trigger only, same as the regular HEI, without the HEI module, and EFI-HEI for GM and aftermarket electronic fuel injection setups. My failure rate is somewhat low, ONE regular HEI module, from being connected backwards by the customer, but, I warrantee it anyway, and no pickup failures. i thought about doing motorcycle ignition systems, but, haven't seen the real need to do so. There are enough good systems out there, replacement parts, and a few here that do excellent ignition resto of our original systems, we don't need another brand new snake oil system to confuse and fail.

Back to balancing, just what balance factor would StarFire use for a Kawasaki triple, H1 engine, with slotted rods?? I know what I would use, and will send that factor to barry b just after I get done with this post, and ask him to hold it until Dayle tells us his answer. I know what engine balancing is, how to do it right, know the theory and application, have done same for over 4 decades, and am not getting into a battle of wits with a completely un-arned person over balancing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Balance it or not
PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 11:46 am 

Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 1:49 am
Posts: 348
Location: Pacifica, CA
Jim C wrote:
Regardless of how one balances:
On a street engine, are there any advantages of a balanced enigne over a typical stocker other than minimizing vibration?

On any rotating mass the effects of balancing will only help if the mass is unbalanced. The question is, is your engine out of balance? The only way to know is to have it balanced. Like I said balancing the pistons and rods is only half the job. Takes expensive equipment to do the crankshaft and the proper knowledge.

Don

_________________
Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Balance it or not
PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 11:50 am 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 6:37 am
Posts: 10460
Location: Rio Rancho, New Mexico
For future reference, I will not tolerate overly confrontational posts. There was NO reason for Dave to call Dayle's post "drivel".

If someone disagrees, just state your point.

_________________
Twist the throttle, tilt the horizon, and have a great time. What triples are all about...........


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Balance it or not
PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 3:19 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 10:12 pm
Posts: 2169
the way i did it was using a counter balance per flywheel. long rod on center. given weight on one side (was 8 oz) as my control. opposite side kept adding weight until it 'balanced', (this was with lead weight in rd crank down). measured difference and removed from flywheel. used a live center and a few v blocks. the wheels were pretty close. is it as good as a dynamic balance? no. but pretty good nonetheless. the crank I rebuilt at home I have spun past 11k, its smooth. My tach is an SPA so its not 'optomistic'. Im not saying its the best method by far but it worked for me.

and anyone who thinks a 120 degree triple crank doesnt need to be balanced... adjust the #3 carb cable 1/8" out from the other 2 and tell me how smooth it is. the total load just changed on one cyl w/the reciprocating mass of that one cyl (idealy) being balanced. .02


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Balance it or not
PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 5:27 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 1:30 am
Posts: 215
Location: New Zealand
m in sc wrote:
the way i did it was using a counter balance per flywheel. long rod on center. given weight on one side (was 8 oz) as my control. opposite side kept adding weight until it 'balanced', (this was with lead weight in rd crank down). measured difference and removed from flywheel. used a live center and a few v blocks. the wheels were pretty close. is it as good as a dynamic balance? no. but pretty good nonetheless. the crank I rebuilt at home I have spun past 11k, its smooth. My tach is an SPA so its not 'optomistic'. Im not saying its the best method by far but it worked for me.

and anyone who thinks a 120 degree triple crank doesnt need to be balanced... adjust the #3 carb cable 1/8" out from the other 2 and tell me how smooth it is. the total load just changed on one cyl w/the reciprocating mass of that one cyl (idealy) being balanced. .02


This is exactly the way to do it. Statically balance per cylinder. You cannot dynamically balance a triple crank set at 120 degrees.... there is nothing opposite to balance. No opposing force between cylinders. That was the original question... do the pistons, rods etc have to be the same weight. The answer is still no.

_________________
http://3cyl.com/mraxl/starfire/starfire.htm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Balance it or not
PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 6:08 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 1:30 am
Posts: 215
Location: New Zealand
Well Moo.... I reckon that was real DRIVEL, and I reckon I do have the right of reply.

Tuner, To hell with all these other bikes... the original questions referred to only the 120 degree triple. Hondas, Laverdas, V12s etc have NOTHING to do with it. I specifically stated inlines and other than 120 degree triples were different. You are putting ALL engines in the one basket. Triples are different Tuner, they fire at 120 degrees. Ignitions...... I have yet to see one of yours..... I know I have asked about these once or twice. Do you have photos??? I believe these are special phantom ignition units, and never break down. Fortunately, for hundreds of happy customers, mine are real ones Tuner, and can and do give problems, just as my balancing machine is also real. Unlike your perfect "Hank the Crank" model, mine is home built, so of much lesser quality.
My balancing factor would likely be different to yours Tuner.... as likely would anyone elses who statically balances crankshafts. I thought an expert like you would know that. Basically, it means your guess at how much of the rod is actually reciprocating, and how much is rotating, will be different to mine.... thats if you actually have a real conrod to play with. Fortunately, as I have already said, and have proved, triples cannot be balanced as a unit, so almost any balance factor is likely to work, vibes worse higher or lower in the rev range.. Tuner,there are many ways of acheiving the same ends, you seem to think there is only one, you almost appear to do everything by rote, with no great understanding of why, and drop in a name here or there, names that are no doubt famous in the US, but meaningless to me. For all I know, this Hank the Crank dude may have given you this balancing machine cause it was shagged.... it doesnt automatically mean it must be the best, else why would he give it to you?? . Rather than being nasty to people, I invite you to make some vector diagrams of the forces involved with a 120 degree triple using the information/links I have posted to back up my claims. These diagrams I use to calculate electrical load imbalances in three phase electrical systems, so work very well for triples. Do two lots..... one using matched cylinder weights, and another set using unmatched cylinder weights. That way, I cannot be accused of fiddling the results, as you clearly dont trust my judgment. Post them here, prove me wrong, bet you cant. You may even learn something ,instead of your normal name calling, name dropping and citing irrelevant stuff you have probably just read somewhere.



H2RTuner wrote:
Actually, a 120 degree triple balances better than a 180 degree one ever will. Now, before you tell me I am an idiot, remember the Laverda triples. First series was 120 degree crank phasing, later ones, 180. The later engines vibrate far more than the early ones, even after the correct balance is attained. The 120 degree engines fire all 3 in one 360 degree phase, and dead head the other 360 degree cycles event. The 180 crank engine has the regular two cyls at TDC together, one on fire, one on overlap. The center cyl is 180 degrees later, and only one cyl fires. This gives us a 1809 degree firing pulse setup on the firsat 360 rotation, and a single fire on the next 360 degree phasing. Vibration city. Think of the 180 engine as an inline 4, with one cylinder spark plug wire yanked off.

Lets take a closer look at the Honda inline 125 5 cylinder, and Ferrari V12.

125 5 had coupling reversals every 72 degrees of 360 degree revolution, somewhat good overlap of events. But, that was on just one of the 720 degree cycles of a 4 stroke. That engine fired all 5 on one of the 360 degree phasings, and dead headed the other 360, creating a large "hole" that had other vibration issues.

The Ferrari V12 has 60 degree phasing, all 720 degrees, and is smooth as a baby's tuchas. In this engine, we have 6 equally spaced firing pulses in EACH 360 degree event, with 60 degree coupling overlap. Way smooth.

The less overlap of firing events per 360 degree rotation, the smoother the engine is, and, when balance is correct, smoother still.

Cadillac/LaSalle had a V16 4 stroke engine in the late 1930's, and it was reported to be so smooth, one could put a lit cigarette on the air filter, on end, and rev the engine, and the only thing that would alter the cigarette's position was the air blown back from the fan behind the radiator. 1930's. V16, 720 degrees, 45 degrees coupling overlap. Dead smooth.

Yes, I do have a crankshaft balancing machine, have had one for 40 plus years, came out of Hank Bechloft's "Crank Shaft Company" performance shop in Los Angeles, where I worked, and learned balancing correctly. Hank founded "Hank, the Crank" later, did balancing all the way up to his death, and, I used to go by and help when I could at Hank's new place. I did all the racer crank balancing when I worked for R.C. Engineering as well, for the Top Fuel and Pro-Stock bikes.

The question is, just how many "Star-Fire" ignitions have blown up, didn't work from new, and were recalled" That I want to know.

Just about anyone can do an ignition system these days, but, doing a good one is a lot harder than is made out in the advertizing world. I do custom ignition systems for cars, convert older point distributors to a conversion I devised and developed, using existing GM HEI modules. I do one for a regular HEI, carburetted engines, vacuum and mechanical advance, MSD trigger only, same as the regular HEI, without the HEI module, and EFI-HEI for GM and aftermarket electronic fuel injection setups. My failure rate is somewhat low, ONE regular HEI module, from being connected backwards by the customer, but, I warrantee it anyway, and no pickup failures. i thought about doing motorcycle ignition systems, but, haven't seen the real need to do so. There are enough good systems out there, replacement parts, and a few here that do excellent ignition resto of our original systems, we don't need another brand new snake oil system to confuse and fail.

Back to balancing, just what balance factor would StarFire use for a Kawasaki triple, H1 engine, with slotted rods?? I know what I would use, and will send that factor to barry b just after I get done with this post, and ask him to hold it until Dayle tells us his answer. I know what engine balancing is, how to do it right, know the theory and application, have done same for over 4 decades, and am not getting into a battle of wits with a completely un-arned person over balancing.

_________________
http://3cyl.com/mraxl/starfire/starfire.htm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Balance it or not
PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 6:16 pm 

Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 3:15 am
Posts: 224
Location: Kingdom of the Netherlands
It is impossible to fully balance a 120 deg three without (a) balance shaft(s). While the primary and secondary forces cancel each other, as do the rotating forces and moments, the primary and secondary moments don't because the three cylinders aren't located in the same plane. The greater the distance between cylinder centrelines, the larger the oscillating (or reciprocating if you prefer) mass and the higher the rpms, the more serious the problem is. The ratio of stroke to conrod length is also of influence.The primary and secondary moments cause a rocking couple which is responsible for the vibration.
Tuner is right that the 180 deg Laverda triples are worse than the 120 deg versions. Never understood why Laverda made the switch- sales gimmick perhaps?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Balance it or not
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 4:26 am 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 12:52 am
Posts: 360
Location: London, UK
Gerrit wrote:
Tuner is right that the 180 deg Laverda triples are worse than the 120 deg versions. Never understood why Laverda made the switch- sales gimmick perhaps?

The way I understood it was that Laverda always envisaged using a 120 crank but they had to get the bike into production quickly for cashflow issues. So they stuck the 180 in as as a stop gap as it didn't cost much to develop with the motor basically being derived from the SF, with one cylinder added. The 120 crank was introduced many years later than they originally planned when they brought out the Corsa model.

Regarding the vibration, you are so right Gerrit in that it is a procession made worse by the length of the crank, with the crank ends scribing conical paths around the centre point.
I don't understand however the statement that there are NO opposing forces. Agreed they are not DIRECTLY opposing but both of the other pistons must be exerting SOME amount of opposing force, just at a different phase from the simple "up and down" of a 180.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Balance it or not
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 8:01 am 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 10:40 pm
Posts: 645
Location: Helsinki Finland
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VhAHDf890is

Peace :e8


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group