And, I gave him what we did to do the first drilling, and, my opinion as well, from practical, hands-on, I was th4ere, did that application, 40 years of it.
Jim, the only reason I can think of for the pads doing that is possibly, the champher on the holes wasn't enough, not the right angle, that stuff does make a difference. We used stock street bike pads as well, nothing special, no aftermarket pads. I can see if the holes weren't champhered enough,m the pads could get cut away, but quick. I would also think that if that occurred, the heat from the process would be intense, possibly enough to elaminate the pad material from the pad backing. NOT GOOD, sir. We ran those setups hard, at a lot of different tracks, long, short, low braking like Talladega, Ontario, to lots of intense braking, like Laguna, Loudon, and never had a problem.
The engineer that did the first pattern for us, Dave Hussey, a Bertea Corporation Engineer that moonlighted doing the reverse blueprints for Elliott Morris (Morris Mags, they were literally on the other side of the wall in the facility we were in, in So. Cal.). Dave was the one that did the investigation of the "holy disks" off the Porsche's, and found the holes should be twice the thickness of the disk. The factory disks were .240 thick, so, we fudged, and "rounded the holes off" to 1/2 inch, from the spec .480 inch diameter, and champhered with a 60 degree angle cutter, .040 deep per hole opening.
We took the swept area of the disk, inner and outer edges, and moved the outer and inner holes IN from the pad edges .100 inch. We did what Walms says, we left the edge of the pad past the hole edge runs.
That's the way we did it for the first time, a long time ago. Somebody had to start this whole "holy disks" mess, just to keep Dave Hussey happy.
|