Kawi2strokes.com Forum

Enthusiasts from around the world dedicated to the preservation and ritual flogging of the infamous Kawasaki 2-stroke Triples
It is currently Tue Apr 16, 2024 6:35 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 9:07 pm 

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:59 pm
Posts: 313
Location: South Australia
That is why I think it is marginal. I used to regularly get 13mpg from my stock H1-B and it would do a massive lean sneeze if held WOT for more than a mile or so. Then I corrected fuel flow. Fixed it. I realise the bike may never be ridden like that, but it is heaps easier to check the fuel flow now, than change pistons later.

_________________
I am just a man working in a tin shed.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 9:16 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 7:03 am
Posts: 4604
Location: Milang, South Australia
So what type of tap would you use in a street H2, for example, given that you pretty much need a reserve position.....?

_________________
"One day, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it's worth watching." : anon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 9:56 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 6:37 am
Posts: 10460
Location: Rio Rancho, New Mexico
I think one will find without the filters, the flow is more than enough, just looking at them the inlet and outlet are smaller than the 3/16" hose. And as I did, it's easy to convert the stock petcock to 1/4" lines. And I run all 3 38's off of one spigot.

_________________
Twist the throttle, tilt the horizon, and have a great time. What triples are all about...........


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 1:29 pm 

Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2016 4:31 am
Posts: 164
Location: North of Copenhagen, Denmark, Europe
Ja-Moo wrote:
According to your picture in the other thread, you have the filters installed backwards. I don't think it makes a big difference though.


Your'e quite right, Ja-Moo!. Thanks!!
I oversaw the arrow on all three filters. So when I make errors, I'm consistent and do it properly ;)
Will make another test...

_________________
Peter says:
Keep the revs up !

Bikes:
H1 Candy Red, 1970
Moto Guzzi Daytona 1000, 1992


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 1:30 pm 

Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2016 4:31 am
Posts: 164
Location: North of Copenhagen, Denmark, Europe
Neville Lush wrote:
That is why I think it is marginal. I used to regularly get 13mpg from my stock H1-B and it would do a massive lean sneeze if held WOT for more than a mile or so. Then I corrected fuel flow. Fixed it. I realise the bike may never be ridden like that, but it is heaps easier to check the fuel flow now, than change pistons later.


Exactly, Neville ;)

_________________
Peter says:
Keep the revs up !

Bikes:
H1 Candy Red, 1970
Moto Guzzi Daytona 1000, 1992


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:31 pm 

Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2016 4:31 am
Posts: 164
Location: North of Copenhagen, Denmark, Europe
Ja-Moo wrote:
Say you are getting a dismal 10mpg, and you are doing 120 mph for 1 minute. That's 2 miles in a minute. So you are looking at 2 miles at 10mpg, or 1/5th of a gallon. There are 3785.41 cc's in a gallon, so 1/5th of 3785 is 757cc's.

Just the math of it all........ ;)


Yeah - I get your point - even though miles and (us) gallons aren't my natural preferences ;)
I'll do another test, with filters pointer the right way, and one without the external filters. I still have 2 Suzuki :!: :!: filters mounted on petcock + the strainer.

_________________
Peter says:
Keep the revs up !

Bikes:
H1 Candy Red, 1970
Moto Guzzi Daytona 1000, 1992


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 3:02 pm 

Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2016 4:31 am
Posts: 164
Location: North of Copenhagen, Denmark, Europe
900SL wrote:
Ja-Moo wrote:
According to your picture in the other thread, you have the filters installed backwards. I don't think it makes a big difference though.


Your'e quite right, Ja-Moo!. Thanks!!
I oversaw the arrow on all three filters. So when I make errors, I'm consistent and do it properly ;)
Will make another test...


Did a new test during the weekend:
Approx 16 sec for 250 ccm without hoses and filters
Aprox 17,5 sec for 250 ccm with hoes and filters installed the right way :D That more than 2 secs faster than my earlier attempt.

I'll dare to conclude that the petcock can deliver sufficient amounts of Go-Go juice for riding WOT. Maybe not for hours, but at least for my intended use.

If I'll rely on the Suzuki filters on the petcock alone + the strainer I can cut another 2 secs. of:
Image

_________________
Peter says:
Keep the revs up !

Bikes:
H1 Candy Red, 1970
Moto Guzzi Daytona 1000, 1992


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group