Jim wrote:
Just wondering, since mine pulls like a 4-stroke to the powerband, when it pulls way harder. Other than the flat spot around 5,200 rpm, that is. You should be able to tune away all the boggy spots.
Hope to get all the bogy spots gone! It would be a lot better.
The question is what kind of four stroke does it pull like..the only comparison I can make to it right now in the rpm range 2500 to 5000 would be the old yamaha 400 special I had around for a few years, it may be a touch better than that but not a lot.
And I sure don't pull like the Harley I rode yesterday that thing will pull you arms off in 5th gear from a rolling start at 20 mph!!
Please don't take the comments as anything but me trying to figure this bike out with NO experience with it.
Once it gets to 6000 to 6500 it turns into a different animal, and once I get the main sorted out that will be even better!
jyrgNorway wrote:
Your port map points to a quite streetable H2 demus. This should work out quite fine, not radical at all, but remember your pipes are quite revvy I think, but I am not sure as I have not dynoed them.
But be aware of that 34 carbs on a ported H2 with pipes are VERY small. At least I had success adding 38's instead of those rather tiny 34's.
From your description, it seems like you have a huge flat spot right before you are in the powerband, since you need to be at 6500 to be able to accelerate. That is same behaviour as I had running 34's, Aylor reeds and pipes, and I could not get rid of it. (even tried the moderate higgspeed pipes, but the huge flat spot was still there, but I had great peak power, 109 rwhp with them jollyes, and 90 I think, with higgspeed)
I have the dyno curve somewhere of both vm34 reeds higgspeed and jollymoto comboes somewhere, but it is not really combarable to yours as the ex duration was 200 degrees, with ex port wider and more square for better blow down area and stronger exhaust pulse, and also the transfer duration was higher
..j.
Jørgen
From what I can tell with the way this was set up with the porting and the pistons which had 4mm cut (don't matter now with the reeds and the holes in the sides pistons

) and the Spec II pipes which were all part of the "package" PHR sold my cousin it was meant to be driven at a high rpm. And this would have suited my cousin well he liked riding every bike he had to its limit all the time, what ever that limit was he would be there. When we were kids riding I had to promise my mom I wound not try to keep up…I couldn't anyway but I tried

. He even beat me in the twistys once on a Harley Soft Tail and I was on my Suzuki GS1150, both bikes are pigs... but a Soft Tail…
Anyway with the flat spot I assume changing needle heights and such would have little affect in that area, is that correct?
If I am trying to jet the flat spot (which I think I am) am I going to mess up the jetting somewhere else?
I think I am understanding why then you would want to be the richest you can be on the needle without burbling and problems.
Im moving on the the main jet and then I will play with the needles again later. I may just have to get used to the way it works, I dont think I can afford to switch it back to no reeds, although I would be neat to have another one with big carbs and good porting and a good pipe

..someday maybe.
Not being able to accelerate on the free way above 75mph sucked, I either had to be revving the crap out of it or just suffer in one spot hope that changes with the main jet a bit.
And I saw your post about warming it up and its very true I was surprised how different it ran once it really got hot and my 15 mile test runs from home when I was testing jetting are not enough to properly heat it up.